To answer this question, let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:
Option A) Using an obscure SSID to confuse and distract an attacker - This option is incorrect. While using an obscure SSID might make it slightly harder for an attacker to find your WLAN, it does not provide adequate security protection. An attacker can still discover the SSID through various means, such as monitoring network traffic or using specialized tools.
Option B) Not using any SSID at all to prevent an attacker from connecting to the network - This option is incorrect. While not broadcasting the SSID can make it harder for an attacker to detect the WLAN, it does not provide adequate security protection. An attacker can still discover the SSID through various means, such as monitoring network traffic or using specialized tools.
Option C) Not broadcasting an SSID to make it harder to detect the WLAN - This option is incorrect for the same reasons as option B. Not broadcasting the SSID does not provide adequate security protection.
Option D) None of the above - This option is correct. None of the options mentioned above offer adequate security protection. It is important to implement other security measures, such as strong encryption (e.g., WPA2) and a strong password, to secure a WLAN effectively.
The correct answer is D) None of the above. None of the mentioned configurations of a WLAN's SSID offer adequate security protection.